Prediction of Bill Scanlon vs Per Hjertquist Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
B. Scanlon vs P. Hjertquist

Bill Scanlon

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Per Hjertquist

SWE

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Scanlon 1 - 0 Hjertquist

They have played 2 sets in total, with Bill Scanlon winning 2 and Per Hjertquist winning 0. The last match between Bill Scanlon and Per Hjertquist was at the Genova WCT, 22-02-1982, Round: R3, Surface: Carpet, with Bill Scanlon getting the victory 6-2 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Scanlon	1
Hjertquist	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) Genova WCT(02-22-82)

Stats

Bill Scanlon

Per Hjertquist

B. Scanlon vs P. Hjertquist H2H Profile

B. Scanlon	Stats	P. Hjertquist
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
55.03% (328-268)	Career Total W/L	45.76% (81-96)
1	Indoor	0
7	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

B. Scanlon vs P. Hjertquist Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bill Scanlon has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Per Hjertquist has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bill Scanlon, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Per Hjertquist has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Bill Scanlon has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Per Hjertquist has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Bill Scanlon has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Per Hjertquist winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Bill Scanlon has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 59% (W/L 59/41), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Per Hjertquist has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 51/62), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
Player level: In the last year, Bill Scanlon has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Per Hjertquist has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bill Scanlon winning 1 times and Per Hjertquist being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Bill Scanlon winning 2 and Per Hjertquist winning 0.
The last match between Bill Scanlon and Per Hjertquist was at the Genova WCT, 22-02-1982, Round: R3, Surface: Carpet, with Bill Scanlon getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bill Scanlon has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Per Hjertquist has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bill Scanlon has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Per Hjertquist has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Bill Scanlon has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Per Hjertquist has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Bill Scanlon vs Per Hjertquist Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

B. Scanlon vs P. Hjertquist H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

B. Scanlon	Stats	P. Hjertquist
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	6
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

B. Scanlon Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Cincinnati - 14-08-1989
R2 Ramesh KrishnanR. Krishnan	L	1-6 6-3 7-6	Stats
Wimbledon - 26-06-1989
R1 Michael ChangM. Chang	L	6-4 6-3 2-6 6-3	Stats
Nagoya CH - 26-04-1989
QF Jonathan CanterJ. Canter	L	6-4 6-1	Stats
R4 Shigeyuki NishioS. Nishio	W	6-1 6-2	Stats
R3 Toru YonezawaT. Yonezawa	W	6-2 6-1	Stats

View All

P. Hjertquist Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Jerusalem CH - 15-04-1985
R3 Menno OostingM. Oosting	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
Vienna CH - 04-03-1985
R3 Magnus TidemanM. Tideman	W	6-1 6-3	Stats
R4 Menno OostingM. Oosting	L	3-6 6-4 6-2	Stats
Geneva - 17-09-1984
R3 Eduardo BengoecheaE. Bengoechea	L	6-4 3-6 6-3	Stats
Tel Aviv - 10-09-1984
R3 Brian LevineB. Levine	L	6-2 6-4	Stats

View All

B. Scanlon vs P. Hjertquist Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

B. Scanlon	Stats	P. Hjertquist
54.34% (319/268)	YTD Win/Loss	45.76% (81/96)
51.89% (767/711)	Sets Win/Loss	45.90% (196/231)
50.49% (7176/7038)	Games Win/Loss	48.27% (1879/2014)
55.92% (118/93)	Hard Win/Loss	41.30% (19/27)
41.98% (34/47)	Clay Win/Loss	45.13% (51/62)
55.67% (108/86)	Indoor Hard W/L	68.75% (11/5)
59.00% (59/41)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/2)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
510	Average Opponent Rank	604.53
49.25% (33/34)	Slam W/L	33.33% (4/8)
48.84% (21/22)	Masters W/L	0.00% (0/6)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	60.00% (3/2)
55.48% (253/203)	Main Tour W/L	47.27% (52/58)
57.14% (12/9)	Challenger W/L	50.00% (22/22)
55% (275/499)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	46% (72/158)
46% (37/81)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	44% (8/18)
17% (1/6)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
57% (107/189)	Deciding Set Win %	56% (31/55)
84% (297/248)	1st Set Won, Won Match	85% (72/61)
16% (297/47)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	15% (72/11)
23% (288/66)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	19% (104/20)